GetPlugD JSTracker

RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Danger of Using The Link A Dink Plugin To Form Unnatural Links

danger.jpgRecently this plugin was written about on CashQuests and Blogging Tips. I am going to explain why you should not use it.

In case you haven’t heard about the Link A Dink Plugin it allows you to set keywords/keyword phrases to be automatically linked to a page of your choice. This can be internal pages of your blog, or as suggested on CashQuests they could be sold to an advertiser looking for some link juice. Whenever you use that word/phrase it links too the page you have set it to link too.

Superficial Benefits

  1. Your readers are shown relevant information without you having to remember what the best post would be to link to.
  2. You can direct traffic to a page directly through the links.
  3. A major search engine ranking factor is the anchor text of inbound links, therefore these links will shoot the desired page to the top of the search results.
  4. If sold to advertisers you could make a whole wad of cash.

Why Each Of Those Benefits Are BS

1. Hopefully when writing a post there is a focus to it and you are trying to get a point across. You don’t see me linking the word ‘blogging’ to the Blogging Fingers Homepage each time I use it. Even with a more specific phrase, like “niche blogging”. Sometimes it may be appropriate to link to my niche blogigng post, but if I did it on every occasion often it wouldn’t fit in with what I am saying. It would mean in this paragraph I would have linked to it twice already instead of once! Links should be chosen carefully to strengthen an argument.

2. Having 100s of links appear in your archives isn’t going to sent floods of traffic. If your traffic stats are anything like mine, it’s the recent posts that get most of the social media traffic, and a few other pages get steady organic Google traffic. It’s a fact that almost all posts on the archive of a blog don’t get much traffic.

3. The supposed SEO benefits are non-existent. I had used the word “blogging” 10 times in the posts on the Blogging Fingers Homepage before this article was published. That means overall there are 100s of uses of the word “blogging”. Do you really think Google looks kindly on 100s of links, all with the exact same anchor text appearing over night? I think not. You’re probably much more likely to be penalised than rewarded by Google for using the Link A Dink Plugin.

4. The advertisers will realise this and not stick around paying you for long. Not to mention that even linking out like this may also result in penalisation just like linking in. I’m deliberately avoiding the elephant in the room of the issue of paid links, which is not the issue in hand.

I would say the plugin has potential, but this sort of unnatural linking is just the sort of thing to avoid. I use internal linking to link to my web hosting packages page when ever a suitable occasion arises, but that is a rare event.

The Solution

If you really want to get into this sort of unnatural linking, there is a more flexible plugin called aLinks. This lets you chose how often you want that word to become a link and it can make the links look much more natural to your readers and the Googlebot. Use it with caution.


If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post8 Comments »

Comment by Kevin Muldoon | 2007-09-27 11:38:26

If you changed a word which is used hundreds of times in your posts then perhaps the search engines will punish you but I doubt it.

Wikipedia uses this exact same system and they are in the top 5 for the majority of search terms on the web so I really doubt google or anyone else can punish you if the link is relevant.

As I said in my post, it could be used to change ‘Contact Us’ to your email or contact page.

I do see where your coming from though. Someone could shoot themselves in the foot if they go crazy with this however if its handled correctly I think it is worthwhile using. :):)

 

Comment by CashQuests | 2007-09-27 12:27:48

Interesting post Matt. Like Kevin I can see where you’re coming from with the SEO issues and I mentioned that in my post as a reason that I would charge advertisers extra to buy a word. As Kevin mentioned, relevance is the key and you shouldn’t sell a word like “the”. A word like “money” would fetch a great price and you haven’t even used it in this post so the SEO problems would be nil.

I do disagree that advertisers wouldn’t stick around though. Even with just the ‘recent posts’ containing links, the amount of traffic generated would be immense. Imagine if John Chow decide to sell the phrase “make money online”. Every post would have at least two links to an advertiser and he would get $1000+ per month for that.

The plugin isn’t right for everyone and every situation but it definitely has potential if used wisely.

 

Comment by Ryan Puusaari | 2007-09-27 12:43:33

Yep, aLinks all the way, it makes adding affiliate links to your blog so simple and doesn’t come across as spammy looking like the link-a-dink.

 

Comment by Cigar Jack | 2007-09-27 13:51:43

I could see where this could be useful for a product review blog like mine. Because most of the time when I type out the name of the cigar I want it linked back to one of my reviews.

 

Comment by Matt Jones | 2007-09-27 16:34:45

Kevin, Wikipedia is so massive it is likely to be hand edited by Google and I don’t think it can be used as an example for the rest of the web. However you and CashQuests may be right. The only way is to test it. I agree keeping a phrase very specific and relevant may solve the issue.

 

Comment by Angel | 2007-09-28 11:04:25

Well said Matt, I agree with you keeping a phrase very specific and relevant may solve the issue.

 

Pingback by Funny Friday: Good Links, Forum Posts, and DealDotCom (9/28/2007) - Internet Marketing Sucks! | 2007-09-28 20:01:04

[…] But one thing you could do is skip out on link a dinking. […]

 

Comment by Find Webhost | 2008-06-18 04:44:33

The anchor text should be modified or changed every now and then. Having the same anchor text for hundreds of links, though it’s legitimate, could send a wrong signal to the Google Bot.

Remember that the GoogleBot is not human. It doesn’t have an emotion. It’s just a robot operating on fixed algorithm.

 

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)



Click here to get The Blog Profits Blueprint bluehost_banner